Still, it remains to be seen whether the caffeine-beverage giant’s move becomes another stimulant for First Amendment advocates and others concerned about free-speech rights. In recent years, Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, has come under frequent criticism for what detractors believe is censorship involving books, CDs, books and other packaged mediaUgh. Businesses do not owe anyone a right to free speech. It may make good business sense, but the First Amendment does not mandate it. The Bill of Rights only applies to government! Get it right, please.
Jiblog is the intellectual repository of a Midwestern, gas guzzlin', beer chuggin', one woman lovin', son of a bitch conservative.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
We need a national civics course
Why do people think that the First Amendment extends to private business? I ask because of this Newsweek story on Starbucks backing away from selling Bruce Springsteen's new album because of a raunchy lyric. Everything ticks along fine until this paragraph near the end of the article:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment