Tuesday, January 30, 2007

20,000,000 deaths is the benchmark for war

At least it is according to this crummy historian. By his logic, we really shouldn't get worked up about attacks until our enemies have conquered a large percentage of the nation and besieged Chicago for five and a half months. Then and only then may we really get mad and fight back. He apparently believes we should fight a rope-a-dope style of war where we wear down the enemy by getting our asses kicked for a while.

Additional
I've been thinking about that 20,000,000. It really is a testament to the people of the USSR that they continued to fight under such staggering losses. It should be a disgrace to the Soviet government, though. Any historian that throws that number around as some sort of relevant benchmark for national defense should go back to taking undergraduate history courses.

No comments: