It is midday right now-lunch time. There are plenty of people out there like me that do a quick scan of the news. During those quick scans, you get the gist of a headline very quickly but it takes an additional moment for what you saw to really register. That was the case here. I briefly scanned the page as I scrolled, and the fact that this was just a movie did not register immediately. That's a punch in the chest, especially with the realistic low resolution image. I'm rather miffed with the Drudge Report right now.
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Displeased with Drudge
There is no doubt about the fact that the Drudge Report loves sensationalism. The sensationalism was more than a little rude this afternoon, however. Right now Drudge is featuring a story about a new flick that will portray the assassination of President Bush in 2007. This is how it looks over at his page:
It is midday right now-lunch time. There are plenty of people out there like me that do a quick scan of the news. During those quick scans, you get the gist of a headline very quickly but it takes an additional moment for what you saw to really register. That was the case here. I briefly scanned the page as I scrolled, and the fact that this was just a movie did not register immediately. That's a punch in the chest, especially with the realistic low resolution image. I'm rather miffed with the Drudge Report right now.
It is midday right now-lunch time. There are plenty of people out there like me that do a quick scan of the news. During those quick scans, you get the gist of a headline very quickly but it takes an additional moment for what you saw to really register. That was the case here. I briefly scanned the page as I scrolled, and the fact that this was just a movie did not register immediately. That's a punch in the chest, especially with the realistic low resolution image. I'm rather miffed with the Drudge Report right now.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment